Social media marketing agency

The research was done by AI agents that open web pages. Some sites refuse them; where that happened we say so. The small numbers point to the source list at the end. Where a figure is our own sum or guess, it is marked “our estimate” and the basis is given.

The claim

These are examples of the claim, copied from our collection of 10 tweets on this scheme¹. View counts are as collected. Dates are worked out from each tweet’s ID number. We quote only the part that states the claim. The page judges the scheme, not the people who tweeted.

“I made a list of the 75 BEST niches to for SMMA that can EASILY scale to $1,000/day”

@CharlieImperium, 10 October 2023, 32,302 views¹

”… I bought a $1500 smma iman gadzhi course on a credit card

and built a 10k/m business in a few weeks

you can start from 0. …”

@orangie, 18 October 2024, 30,014 views¹. This is an extract from a longer tweet; cuts are marked with ”…”. “10k/m” means $10,000 a month.

“The new wave is Facebook Messenger.

I’m booking 10+ SMMA meetings EVERY DAY.”

@georgeytishin, 21 October 2023, 18,249 views¹. An extract from a longer tweet.

“Joined 6-figure SMMA in 2019.

Left my fulltime job in 2020.

Fast forward to today and have grown my agency to multiple 7 figures a year …”

@thedennis, 4 October 2026, 16,336 views¹. An extract; “7 figures” means millions of dollars.

The most-viewed tweet in the collection, with about 97,700 views (a rounded count), said its author had taken a new agency from nothing to $100,000 a month in seven days, and offered a PDF on how to do the same¹. When we checked on 10 October 2026 the account had been set to private and the tweet could not be opened. So we do not quote or name it; the wording above is our summary of the collected copy.

Two more tweets, from a small account we do not name, describe a goal of $10,000 a month from an agency while working two hours a day¹. That is the form of the claim this page tests most closely.

The collection is small: 10 tweets with 230,254 views in total¹. Where it is too thin, the page rests on how the method is promoted generally, on the sellers’ own pages.

What the scheme is

A social media marketing agency, sold online as “SMMA”, is a small business that does marketing for other businesses. The usual clients are local or specialist firms: dentists, gyms, painters, clinics, online shops.

It sells one or both of two services:

• Social media management. Writing and posting for the client’s accounts, and answering comments and messages.
• Paid ads. Setting up and running the client’s adverts on Meta (Facebook and Instagram), Google or TikTok.

The client pays a retainer, which is a fixed monthly fee. The client also pays the ad platform for the adverts themselves. That second sum is called ad spend, and it is not the agency’s income.

In the version sold on X, a beginner picks a “niche” (one type of client), contacts large numbers of business owners who have not asked to be contacted (“cold outreach”), signs a few on retainer, and hands the work to freelancers.

The business is real and ordinary. Agencies’ own price pages show businesses paying these fees²³. In a 2025 survey of 500 US small-business owners, as reported by MarketingProfs, 52% said they outsource at least some marketing, down from 70% in 2023¹⁶. The same write-up says social media management is the service they outsource most often¹⁶.

One thing may shrink that demand. A trade news report of June 2025, passing on a Wall Street Journal story, said Meta aims to let a business create and target adverts fully with AI “by the end of 2026”, starting from a product image and a budget, and that this is expected to help small and midsized businesses with no marketing team⁷². Meta’s own business pages asked us to log in, so we could not see what has been released. Whether this is reducing what small businesses pay agencies for is not known.

So the question is not whether anyone pays for this. It is how many clients the claimed income needs, what it takes to get them, and how many people do.

The arithmetic

Step 1: what the tweets give

The tweet texts give an income and a time span: $100,000 a month in 7 days, $10,000 a month “in a few weeks”, $1,000 a day, “10+ SMMA meetings EVERY DAY”¹. They also give three prices of things bought or offered: a $1,500 course, a playbook “Free for 24h ($495 after)” and a script “FREE (then $295)”¹.

None of the 10 tweet texts gives the price a client pays, the number of clients, how many businesses were contacted, the share that signed, how long clients stay, the costs, or whether the figure is sales or profit¹. We did not view the images, videos, links or threads attached to the tweets, which may say more.

Each of those figures has to come from elsewhere.

Step 2: what one client pays

WebFX also states a general market range of “$500 to $5,000 per month” and $35 to $150 an hour³. Its page shows a table of what marketers say they pay an agency, with no sample size or method; in it, half report paying over $5,000 a month (our sum of its rows)³.

The lower rows are the published prices a newcomer competes against. The higher rows come from established agencies with reviews and past results.

Step 3: clients needed for $10,000 a month

Clients needed = income wanted ÷ fee, rounded up. These are our sums.

So $10,000 a month is roughly 4 to 14 clients held at the same time. This is sales, before any cost or tax.

Step 4: getting the clients

This is the hard step, and the evidence for it is the weakest. We found no measured figures for social media agencies selling to local businesses. The nearest are general figures for business-to-business selling (one company selling to another), published by companies that sell sales tools or services.

• From contact to meeting, by cold email. A UK marketing agency tracked 28,400 leads across 47 cold outreach programmes from January 2024 to March 2026. It reports: “Median meeting-booked rate from cold email is 0.34% in 2026.”¹² The median is the middle one when all are lined up. Its summary reads “1,000 sent → … 21 replies → 3.4 meetings”; it does not say whether “sent” counts emails or businesses¹². The best quarter of programmes booked 0.87% and the worst quarter 0.08%¹². The median reply rate was 2.1%, down from 4.7% in 2022¹². The base is thin: 28,400 leads at 0.34% is about 97 meetings in the whole study (our sum).
• Adding other channels. The same study says: “Multi-channel sequences (email + LinkedIn touch + phone touch) book meetings at 2.7× the rate of email-only sequences”, at 3.2 times the effort per lead¹².
• A cross-check. Instantly, a cold email tool, reports from its own platform for 2025: “The overall average reply rate is 3.43%.” The top 10% of senders got more than 10.7%¹³. It gives no meeting rate.
• From meeting to client. Optifai, a sales software company, gives figures it says come from 939 companies’ sales records and from industry reports¹⁴. Across all companies: “Starting with 100 Discovery deals, only 13 close”¹⁴. A discovery call is the first sales conversation. For small deals, under $25,000 a year, it gives higher rates at each of four stages: 50%, 70%, 80% and 90%¹⁴. Multiplied together that is about 25 clients per 100 first calls (our sum). A retainer of $1,000 to $2,500 a month is $12,000 to $30,000 a year, so the small-deal rate is the closer one.

What follows is rough. It multiplies middle figures from different samples, neither about this trade.

Multiplying the meeting rate by the two closing rates (our estimate): at the median, one client takes roughly 1,200 to 2,300 cold emails. For a top-quarter sender it is roughly 460 to 900. With calls and LinkedIn messages added, the study’s 2.7 times figure would bring the median case down to roughly 430 to 840, for about three times the work. So the honest range is wide: about 400 to 2,300 contacts per client.

In each cell the lower figure uses the small-deal closing rate (25%) and the higher one the all-company rate (13%).

Practitioners’ own reports on Reddit’s r/SMMA forum fit the lower end. One poster wrote: “I’ve send 1000 emails and resulted in 20 warm leads and 1 conversion”³⁸. In another thread, experienced posters put the rule of thumb at about one client for every 100 business owners actually reached by phone, and one said 100 dials reach fewer than 30 owners³⁸. That would be over 300 dials per client (our estimate). These are anecdotes, not data.

These figures cover cold outreach only. Referrals work differently: see “What it takes to compete”.

Step 5: keeping the clients

Clients leave, so the client list has to be refilled. The sources disagree on how fast.

• Focus Digital, an agency, puts yearly client loss at 46% for social media marketing and 49% for paid ads, and 32% for agencies of 1 to 10 staff¹⁵. It gives no sample size or method, so treat it as weak.
• The Planable survey reports client relationships of 14 to 15 months⁵.
• The broker-checked agency reports average engagements of 7 to 8 months⁸.
• The small-business survey reports, via MarketingProfs: “Some 40% of the SMBs that outsource their marketing to an agency churn, and more than half (56%) of those that churn do so within 6-12 months.”¹⁶ “Churn” means the client leaves. SMBs are small and midsize businesses.

On the Focus Digital figure, holding 8 clients means replacing 3 or 4 a year, or about 4,300 to 8,300 more cold emails each year at median rates (our estimate). On the broker-checked agency’s figure, holding 10 clients means signing more than one new client every month (our estimate: 10 ÷ 7.5 months).

Step 6: costs and what is left

• Tools. At the sellers’ list prices: HighLevel, a customer-records system widely used by agencies, is $97, $297 or $497 a month²⁰. Instantly, for cold email, starts at $47 a month²¹. Sprout Social, for scheduling posts, has two cheapest plans at $79 and $199 per user a month billed yearly, or $99 and $249 billed monthly²². A lean set on monthly billing is about $240 to $390 a month (our sum: $97 + $47 + $99 or $249). That is small beside one retainer, but it runs from the first day.
• Delivery. If freelancers or a “white-label” firm (one that does the work under the agency’s name) do the work, that is a cost. Vendasta, one such firm, requires a minimum of $99 or $499 a month in purchases²³. We did not find sourced freelancer rates.
• The course. One tweet names a $1,500 course¹. A third-party review gives the price of that seller’s Agency Navigator course as $1,499²⁴.
• Tax. In the US, the IRS says: “The self-employment tax rate is 15.3%.” It applies to net earnings, on top of income tax⁶⁴.
• Margin (the share of sales left as profit). Promethean Research reports: “The average digital agency earned a 13% after-tax net margin in 2025”, and 19% for agencies with fewer than 10 staff¹⁷. Its sample averages $4.43 million in revenue, so it describes established firms, not a one-person agency¹⁷. Small agencies in the Planable survey report more: over 60% say their margin is at least 20%⁵. The broker-checked agency shows $170,308 profit on $374,532 revenue, about 45% (our division)⁸.

Step 7: the hours

Two hours a day is about 60 hours a month. $10,000 a month over 60 hours is about $167 an hour for every hour worked, selling included (our sum). WebFX’s stated market range is $35 to $150 an hour³.

Now the workload, for the content-management version of the service. LYFE’s $1,350 plan lists vertical videos at 12 posts a month, plus watching and answering the client’s pages². Eight clients is 96 posts a month. In 60 hours that leaves about 37 minutes per post, with nothing left for selling, calls or reports (our sum).

For an agency that only manages ads there is no per-post work, and we found no sourced figure for hours per client. But the selling in Step 4, plus client calls and reports for 4 to 14 clients, has to fit in the same 60 hours.

The two-hour version only works if someone else does the delivery. The broker-checked agency shows this: its listing says “The owners work approximately 4 hours per week” in one place and gives 20 hours in another, and the work is done by a team of eight⁸.

Step 8: the largest claims

These are our sums from the figures above.

• $100,000 a month in 7 days. At $1,550 a client that is about 65 clients signed in a week. At 13 to 25 clients per 100 first calls, that is about 260 to 500 sales calls in seven days²¹⁴. A few very large clients would change the count, so this bounds the claim; it does not disprove it. The tweet text gives no client count¹.
• “10+ SMMA meetings EVERY DAY.” That is about 300 meetings a month. At the median cold email rate of 0.34% it means about 88,000 contacts a month, and about 34,000 at top-quarter rates¹². The tweet describes a different channel (Facebook Messenger), for which we found no measured rates.
• “$1,000/day.” That is $365,000 a year. In US Census data, 4.9% of advertising firms with no paid employees took in $250,000 or more in 2023⁹.

Step 9: how many get there

The best hard figure we found is from the US Census Bureau. It counts businesses with no paid employees from tax records¹¹. That is not always one person: 86% are sole proprietorships, and the rest are partnerships and corporations without staff (our sum)⁹. We call them “no-staff firms” below. In 2023 there were 207,863 of them in “advertising, public relations and related services”, with total sales of $12.64 billion⁹. That is an average of about $60,800 each (our division).

Counts are from the Census file and its code list⁹¹⁰. Shares are our sums. The file’s last band is $1,000,000 to $2,499,999; it lists no advertising firms above that⁹¹⁰.

What it shows:

• 60.1% took in under $25,000 in the year. The middle firm is in the $10,000 to $24,999 band.
• 13.9% (28,925 firms) took in $100,000 or more. $10,000 a month is $120,000 a year, which falls inside the $100,000 to $249,999 band. So the share reaching the tweets’ figure is somewhat below 13.9%, and the data cannot give it exactly.
• 0.66% took in $1 million or more. $100,000 a month is a $1.2 million yearly rate.
• This is the shape of every trade, not of this one. Across all 30.4 million US no-staff firms in every industry, 13.2% took in $100,000 or more and 60.6% under $25,000, with average sales of about $57,600 (our sums)⁹. Advertising firms are almost exactly average. The figures do not show an agency to be a better or a worse bet than any other small business run without staff.

Four limits, and they pull in different directions:

1. These are sales, not profit.
2. The category is wider than social media agencies. It includes public relations, media buying, direct mail and display advertising.
3. It counts only businesses with “receipts of $1,000 or more”¹¹. Anyone who tried and never signed a client is not in it. It is also a snapshot of firms of every age, many run by people with years in the trade. So it overstates the chances of someone starting now.
4. It includes side businesses, and it leaves out every agency that has hired staff. So it understates what full-time and larger agencies make. It is also US only.

For comparison, a salaried job in the same skill: “The median annual wage for market research analysts was $78,760 in May 2025.”¹⁸ That is about $6,560 a month. The average no-staff firm’s $60,800 in sales is below it, but that average includes side businesses, so it is not a like-for-like comparison with a full-time wage.

What people who tried it report

No study, platform or course seller publishes what share of people who start an agency ever sign a client, or how long it takes. What follows is individual accounts. All are the person’s own statement, and none shows proof of payment.

Accounts of slow starts.

• A Reddit poster who started in October 2024 and bought a course wrote: “It took me 3 months of cold calling, countless sales calls to get my first client.”³⁷ The post’s headline says 80 clients. In a follow-up five months later the poster explains there were five clients, one of them the leader of a team of 80 estate agents, and reports two more clients since³⁷.
• A newsletter writer who now publishes agency advice describes 17 months without a client: “I sent over 5000 cold emails, didn’t get a single client”⁴¹. He reports signing his first three clients after that⁴¹.
• A Reddit poster running a new local agency in a town of about 60,000 people reported no client after two months of visits, messages and emails, and wrote: “I send emails; 10 out of 10 ghost me.” Offers of free sample work were not taken up³⁹.

Accounts of success.

• Asked whether anyone makes money running ads for clients, one Reddit poster replied: “Doing 12k/month from my laptop. Took me a year to get here tho. Patience is everything”⁴⁰. In the same thread a poster describing 22 years in the trade said getting clients and running the business are the hard parts⁴⁰.
• In a 2024 thread, one agency owner reported growing from about $2,500 to over $30,000 a month in retainers⁴⁰.

The forum itself. We counted the titles in Reddit’s “top of all time” feed for r/SMMA. Of 100 posts, 45 were sharing, requesting or asking about paid courses³⁶. The count is ours, by title pattern.

Surveys of working agencies. These cover agencies that exist, not everyone who tried.

• Planable, which sells a scheduling tool, surveyed 145 agency owners in late 2024. 20% had no employees and 45% had one to five. 11% had one client, 35% had two to five. Its report says: “13% of respondents declared they’re currently operating at a loss”, mostly those with one client⁵.
• Planable’s March 2026 report on 186 agencies says: “21.5% of agencies in the sample are losing money.” The share was 53.3% for agencies with a single client and 6.5% for those with 20 or more⁶. The page does not describe its method.
• BenchPress, a UK agency survey, found that 46% of agencies named winning new business as their biggest problem, up from 27% two years earlier, according to an interview about the survey⁴⁵.

Survival. In the wider US sector of professional services, counting firms with employees only, 74.5% of those opened in the year to March 2024 were open a year later, and 50.8% of those opened in 2020 lasted five years¹⁹. That says nothing about one-person attempts.

Nothing we found supports “a few weeks” or two hours a day for a beginner. The one fast account, about three months to $30,000 a month, is from a founder who had run an earlier agency for 13 years and used its team and its capital⁴⁴. The beginners’ accounts describe a year or more.

What the rules allow now

Running an agency is allowed. Most quotes in this section were read through a tool that extracts text from pages and should be treated as close, not word-perfect.

Managing a client’s ads is permitted. Meta’s advertising rules say: “If you are managing ads on behalf of other advertisers, each advertiser or client must be managed through separate ad accounts.”⁴⁷ Google has the same rule, and adds: “Avoid making false, misleading, or unrealistic claims.”⁵⁶ Google also tells clients that no one can guarantee an ad position⁵⁶.

The agency carries the client’s risk.

• Meta’s ad terms say that if the advertiser an agency represents breaks the terms, “we may hold you responsible for that violation”⁴⁸. This quote was shortened by our tool.
• Whoever’s card is on the ad account pays. Meta’s payment terms say: “If you purchase an advertisement … you authorize us to charge the payment instruments for those services.” If one card fails, “you authorize us to charge the amount due to complete that transaction to your other payment instruments saved in your account”⁴⁹. A newcomer who runs a client’s ads on their own card owes that money to Meta whether or not the client pays them back. The safer set-up is the client’s own account and card.
• Meta can restrict an ad account or a personal profile. Its help page says “your ad account, its ads and some of its advertising assets are disabled”⁵⁰. A restriction on the owner’s own profile stops their work for every client.
• Meta is tightening checks. A news report says Meta said it removed “159 million scam ads in 2025”, and that it aims for verified advertisers to bring in 90% of ad revenue by the end of 2026, up from 70%⁵¹.
• One agency, Blink Digital, has sued Meta in the Bombay High Court. It alleges that four of its Business Manager accounts (the dashboards through which agencies manage clients’ pages and ad accounts) were disabled, and seeks about ₹1,000 crore (10 billion rupees)⁵². The case is pending and the allegation is untested. The report says Meta was given two weeks to file its reply and that a hearing was set for 12 October 2026⁵². It concerns only the companies named in it.

Automated use of Facebook is restricted. One collected tweet says its author automated the client-getting side of an agency, and two ask readers to comment “MessengerFlow”¹. MessengerFlow’s site says it runs cold message campaigns “through your real Facebook accounts”, up to 50 of them, with automatic pacing, and says: “The fastest way to lose an account is to look automated.”³¹ Meta’s terms say: “You may not access or collect data from our Products using automated means (without our prior permission)”⁵³. We found no statement from Meta about this tool, and MessengerFlow was not asked. Meta’s official route for business pages allows promotional messages only within 24 hours of the user writing first⁵⁴. LinkedIn bans automation tools too⁵⁵. Sending messages by hand is not covered by these rules.

Cold email and calls are legal but regulated.

• The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) says of its email law: “The law makes no exception for business-to-business email.” Penalties run up to $53,088 per email, a figure from a page last edited in January 2024⁶⁰.
• Gmail tells senders to keep spam complaints “below 0.10%” and never reach 0.30%⁶¹. That limits how much cold email can be sent before it is blocked.
• Cold calls to businesses are mostly exempt from the US telemarketing rule. Since 2024 false statements on those calls are covered⁶².
• In the UK, the regulator says “sole traders and some partnerships are treated by PECR as individual subscribers”⁶³. PECR is the UK’s rule on electronic marketing. Cold email to a sole trader, such as a self-employed plumber, needs consent.

Liability for the work. The FTC says: “Advertising agencies have a duty to make an independent check on the information used to substantiate ad claims.”⁵⁸ Its rule on consumer reviews, in force since 21 October 2024, covers agencies. Writing or buying invented reviews, or buying followers, for a client can bring penalties⁵⁹.

Credentials and tax. Google’s Partner badge, a common sign of standing, requires “a 90-day ad spend of $10,000 USD across managed accounts”, so a newcomer sells without it⁵⁷. Since 1 October 2025 Washington State charges sales tax on advertising services⁶⁵.

To re-check. Meta’s ad terms announce an update taking effect on 30 October 2026. We did not read the new text⁴⁸. The outcome of the 12 October hearing in the Blink Digital case is not yet known⁵².

Who makes money from it

In our 10 tweets. Four tweets, from three accounts, ask the reader to comment a word to be sent a PDF, playbook, script or list. Those four hold 183,801 of the 230,254 views, about 80% (our sum)¹. Two more, with about 20% of the views, name a paid course by Iman Gadzhi¹. The other four tweets have 103 views between them¹. So nearly all of the reach belongs to posts that give something away or credit a course. No tweet text shows proof of income; attached images were not viewed.

What the most-viewed accounts link to today. This is what we saw on their pages, not a statement of what they earn.

• The most-viewed account (now private, so not named). Its profile text, which is still shown, points to software pitched to businesses for managing Google Ads³³. We do not know what the 2024 PDF led to.
• @georgeytishin. We name this account, which has under 10,000 followers, because its profile links to a paid product. The bio reads “Do you want to learn cold email?” and the website field is a checkout for a membership called Lead Academy: “7 days free Then $103.95 per month”³². That is a different product from the Messenger method in the 2023 tweets. Both tweets ask readers to comment “MessengerFlow”¹. We do not know this account’s relationship to MessengerFlow. Today, three years after the tweets, MessengerFlow sells a playbook at “$799 once” and plans from $92 to $391 a month billed yearly³¹.
• @CharlieImperium. The profile, under the name Charlie Morgan, links to start.imperiumacquisition.com, and its bio offers an “AI Marketing Agency Course To $10K/mo For FREE”³⁴. Imperium Acquisition’s home page lists Charlie Morgan as co-founder²⁷. Its site offers a free community (“FREE now. Might be paid soon.”), then paid programmes sold through a booked call, with no prices shown²⁷.
• The course named in two tweets. Iman Gadzhi’s X profile says “Owner: http://consulting.com”³⁴. Two older addresses, educate.io and growyouragency.com, now redirect to Consulting.com²⁵. Its entry programme is described as “For early-stage founders building and launching their first digital product business”, not an agency, and is shown as closed to new buyers²⁵.
• @thedennis, who credits that course, has a profile that reads “Founder, DDU MEDIA” and links to a page reading “Work with my agency → apply. For 7-figure+ brands ready to scale.”³⁴ The same page lists “The ADvantage Program”³⁴. That is some evidence the path from course to working agency exists. His revenue figures are his own.

What the sellers say about typical results. Neither of the two course sellers we checked publishes one.

• The terms published at educate.io, the address that now redirects to Consulting.com, say: “We make no guarantees of income or specific results. Any examples, testimonials, or case studies are not typical”²⁵²⁶. The named guarantee is more coaching: “It is not a money-back guarantee or promise of specific earnings.”²⁶
• Imperium’s disclaimer says it does not guarantee “that you will have any earnings”²⁸. Its home page shows “2,000 + Total Students”, “1,000 + 6-Figure Students” and “300 + Millionaire Students”²⁷. These are the seller’s own counts, with no proof shown.
• One Trustpilot reviewer wrote that Imperium’s refund guarantee required “500 outbound cold approaches per day”²⁹. The page shows 25 September 2025 against the review, which is Trustpilot’s date of the experience; the review’s ID number and its place in the list point to its being posted in September 2026 (our reading)²⁹. The company replied that the guarantee’s conditions are set out in a written agreement, that the 500-a-day condition “isn’t something we require for new or existing clients anymore”, and that it had refunded a large part of this customer’s payment²⁹. This is one customer’s unverified account. Imperium is rated 4.7 of 5 there²⁹.

Others who are paid when a newcomer signs up.

• HighLevel pays referrers: “Agency Unlimited Account: 40%” of the subscription²⁰. That is about $119 a month for each referred $297 plan (our sum).
• Skool, which hosts many agency communities, pays referrers 40% and says: “This makes Skool an income stream, not a cost.”³⁵
• MessengerFlow pays referrers: “Earn 20% on every payment your referrals make.”³¹
• Cold email tools and white-label firms charge monthly whether or not a client has been signed²¹²³.

Regulators. We found no regulator or court action about an agency course or about anyone quoted on this page. The FTC has acted against sellers of other “start a business” coaching over income claims. These cases concern only the companies named in them, sold different products, and are not evidence about any agency course.

• Lurn and its chief executive agreed in 2023 to proposed court orders requiring them to turn over $2.5 million. The FTC’s complaint alleged the company had no information to back up its earnings claims. The case was settled without a court ruling on the allegations⁶⁶.
• In the Growth Cave case, the FTC’s 2025 complaint alleged that most buyers “do not make a single sale”⁶⁷. It ended in January 2026 in settlement orders with a judgment of $48,597,538, partly suspended, and no court ruling on the allegations⁶⁸.
• In the Air AI case, a proposed settlement was announced in March 2026; the FTC lists the case as pending⁶⁹.
• In January 2025 the FTC proposed extending its earnings-claim rules to business coaching; we did not find whether that was made final⁷⁰.

The upside

Some people do build agencies that pay well. This section sets out the best documented cases, marked by who checked them.

One agency checked by a broker

Empire Flippers is a broker of online businesses and says it reviews businesses before listing them. One listing, marked sold, describes the business like this: “Founded in April 2023, this digital marketing agency specializes in Google & Meta Ads for two high-performing niches: medical spas and outdoor lifestyle brands”⁸.

• Revenue $374,532 and net profit $170,308. The listing does not label the period. It also says the business passed $500,000 in total revenue in 2.5 years, which fits reading $374,532 as the latest 12 months⁸.
• Listed at $411,578. The final sale price is not shown⁸.
• “$1,100+ per client per month”, with clients staying 7 to 8 months on average⁸.
• It signs 4 to 5 new clients every month, through outreach, paid ads and referrals⁸.
• The work is done by “a highly trained team of eight long-term specialists”⁸.

This is one winner, not a sample. It shows a sales and staffing operation, about two and a half years old when listed, not a one-person two-hour job.

Smaller agencies on other marketplaces

• A Flippa listing for an 8-month-old US agency showed “$19,436.66 in client receipts during a verified operational period” and an asking price of $5,010⁴⁶.
• A paid-ads agency on Acquire.com, founded in July 2022 with five people, showed $100,000 in revenue over the past year and asked $100,000. We did not confirm those figures were checked⁴⁶.

Founders’ own statements

None of these was checked by a third party.

• Base Coat Marketing, which serves painting firms, reported “$30,000 in monthly recurring revenue with roughly a 50% profit margin” about three months after starting⁴⁴. Its founder had run an earlier agency for 13 years. He reports using its capital and “established team”, investing “roughly $5000/month”, and winning his first three clients through Google Ads⁴⁴.
• Starter Story’s list of agency founders runs from one-person operators at $120,000 a year to staffed agencies at $360,000 to $6 million a year⁴². The site does not check the figures.
• The Reddit accounts above: $12,000 a month after a year, and $2,500 growing to over $30,000 a month⁴⁰.
• The @thedennis tweet quoted at the top reports an agency at “multiple 7 figures a year”, seven years after the 2019 start it gives¹.

What the top of the range takes in

From the Census table for no-staff advertising firms (sales, not profit)⁹:

• About the top seventh (13.9%) took in $100,000 or more.
• About the top twentieth (4.9%) took in $250,000 or more.
• About the top 2% took in $500,000 or more.
• About the top 0.7% took in $1 million or more.

The bands cannot place the lines more exactly. The top tenth starts somewhere between $100,000 and $249,999, and the top hundredth somewhere between $500,000 and $999,999 (our reading of the table).

Agencies with employees are not in that table. Promethean Research counts more than 71,000 agencies in North America, 87% with fewer than 50 staff¹⁷.

A realistic good result in the first year or two (our estimate)

No source measures this. It is our reading of the figures above.

A good first year for a competent person starting cold: a first paying client after about three months or more of daily outreach, often after one free or cheap job to show a result. The only two accounts that time it say 3 months and 17 months³⁷⁴¹. People who start with businesses they already know, such as a past employer’s clients, can have a first client at once⁴²⁴⁴. Then two to five clients at $1,000 to $2,500 each by the end of the year. That is $2,000 to $10,000 a month in sales before tools, helpers and tax, at far more than two hours a day.

A good second or third year: holding $10,000 a month or more. That puts an owner near the top seventh of US no-staff advertising firms⁹. It means replacing clients as they leave.

The common result: side-income sums. 60% of no-staff advertising firms took in under $25,000 in 2023, and that count leaves out everyone under $1,000⁹¹¹.

What it takes to compete

What the people who succeed have

1. A skill that produces a result a client can see. The clear successes sell a measurable result in one trade: ads for medical spas, marketing for painters⁸⁴⁴. The skill is taught in ordinary jobs, where the median pay is $78,760 a year¹⁸. Several documented founders came from such jobs or from an earlier agency⁴²⁴⁴.
2. Proof before selling. One founder already served painting firms at his previous agency⁴². The newcomer in the forum who could not give sample work away had no such proof³⁹. One collected tweet, from a small account that says it works with agencies, lists giving something useful for free first among the things successful agencies share¹.
3. A way to get clients that is not only cold outreach. In a 2024 survey of 612 agency owners and consultants, 66% said their top source of new business was referrals from existing and past clients; outbound selling was the top source for “just over 6%”⁷¹. Of the 60% who had tried outbound, 10% called it very effective and 34% not effective at all⁷¹. Among the 37% of agencies in the Planable survey with margins above 40%, 59% use referrals to win clients, 50% their own social media, 30% content and 20% cold outreach⁵. The tweets promote cold outreach scripts and automation¹. A newcomer has no past clients to refer them. Someone with a network or a past employer’s contacts starts with the main channel already working.
4. Willingness to sell every day, for months. By cold email, one client takes somewhere between about 400 and 2,300 contacts (Step 4). The broker-checked agency signs 4 to 5 new clients every month while clients stay 7 to 8 months⁸. The same collected tweet lists heavy daily outreach as another shared trait¹.
5. Enough clients to get past the fragile stage. 53.3% of one-client agencies were losing money, against 6.5% of those with 20 or more⁶.
6. Help with delivery. The larger cases use staff: a team of eight in the broker-checked case⁸.
7. Money to last. Little cash is at risk, but income may be near zero for months. The one fast case invested about $5,000 a month and had an existing agency’s team behind it⁴⁴.

What it costs

Tools run to about $240 to $390 a month (Step 6). A course, if bought, is about $1,500¹²⁴; nothing we found shows one is needed. An outreach tool of the kind in the tweets is $92 to $391 a month, with no refund once used in a billing period³¹. Meta’s terms restrict automated use, and accounts can be lost³¹⁵³. The main cost is time: months of unpaid selling, then the hours of delivery or the pay of whoever does it.

How to tell early which side you are on

These checks are our judgement, built from the figures above.

• Can you already get a result? If you have never run ads or grown an account that brought a business customers, you are selling something you cannot yet deliver. A job, or one free project with measured results, tests this cheaply.
• Reply and meeting rates. After 500 to 1,000 contacts, compare with the benchmarks: about 2% to 3.4% replying and 0.34% booking a meeting is the middle; 0.87% booking is the top quarter¹²¹³. No replies at all after several hundred points to the offer or the list, not to bad luck.
• A first client within about six months of steady outreach. This cut-off is our judgement, with almost no data behind it: two timed accounts, of 3 and 17 months³⁷⁴¹.
• Does the first client stay and refer? Referrals are the top source of new business for two thirds of working agencies⁷¹. A client who leaves within six months is in the group the churn figures describe¹⁶.
• Whose card pays for the ads? If it is yours, you carry the client’s debt⁴⁹.
• Does the plan need you to buy something first? The arithmetic above is free to check. Neither seller we checked publishes what share of its students sign a client²⁶²⁸.

What we did not verify

• How many people who try this succeed. No source gives the share of starters who sign a client, their income or the time to a first client. The Census figures are the nearest substitute. They match every other trade, leave out everyone under $1,000 in sales, cover a wider category than social media agencies, and are US only.
• The income claims in the tweets. None was checked against any record. We read the tweets from our collected copy and did not view their images, videos, links or threads. The most-viewed tweet is now private. The folder the tweets were read from is dated 2026-10-10 while the collection date is given as 2026-10-06; we did not resolve which date the view counts belong to.
• Conversion rates for this trade. The meeting and closing rates are for business-to-business selling in general, from companies that sell sales services, and the cold email study holds about 97 meetings in all. We found no rates for agencies selling to local businesses, for cold calling or for Messenger outreach, and no hours-per-client figure for ads-only work.
• Platform automation. Meta’s reported plan for fully AI-built adverts is known to us from one 2025 trade article. What has been released, and its effect on agencies, is not known.
• Surveys and client loss. Planable, HeyOrca and Focus Digital sell to agencies and give little or no method. Promethean, Clutch and WebFX give no sample counts. BenchPress and the small-business survey were read in write-ups, not the reports. How SparkToro found its respondents was not checked.
• The broker listing. We did not see the records. The period of the figures is not labelled, the sale price is not public, and the listing gives two figures for the owners’ hours. Flippa’s “verified” label and the Acquire.com figures were not checked.
• Founders’ accounts. Every Starter Story, Reddit, newsletter and tweet figure is the person’s own statement. We found no agency income checked by a journalist.
• Course prices and sellers. The official price of the course named in the tweets was not found; $1,499 is from a reviewer who promotes a competing programme. Imperium’s prices and guarantee terms were not found. The Trustpilot review’s posting date was worked out, not read.
• Prices. Freelancer and white-label delivery rates were not sourced; Upwork and Fiverr refused us.
• Rules and law. Meta’s terms from 30 October 2026 were not read, nor Meta’s own post behind the 159 million figure. The Blink Digital case is known from one news article. The email penalty figure may have risen since January 2024. We read FTC press releases, not the complaints and orders. Rules outside the US and UK were not checked.
• Exact quotes. Many pages were read through a tool that extracts text, or through a reader service (r.jina.ai) where sites refused us. On the final check, the Reddit threads behind³⁷ to⁴⁰ refused us except the follow-up post in³⁷, and the count of 45 in³⁶ was not redone.
• Contact. The people and companies named here were not contacted.

Sources

“Read at source” means we opened the page itself on 10 October 2026. “Secondary” means we read an article or summary about the source, not the source itself. “Estimate” means our own sum. “Through a reader service” means a service fetched the page for us because the site refused our tools directly.

1. Does It Pay collection of 10 tweets on this scheme, collected 2026-10-06; individual tweets linked above. Read from our collected copy on 2026-10-10, not from the live tweets. Counts and shares are our sums (estimate). The most-viewed tweet was private when checked on 2026-10-10 and is not linked.
2. LYFE Marketing, social media management pricing. https://www.lyfemarketing.com/social-media-management-pricing/ . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
3. WebFX, social media pricing. https://www.webfx.com/social-media/pricing/ . 2026-02-27. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
4. HeyOrca, social media agency pricing survey. https://heyorca.com/blog/social-media-agency-pricing . 2024-05-28. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
5. Planable, Agency Profit Margins Report 2025 (145 agency owners). https://planable.io/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/agency-profit-margins-report-2025.pdf . 2025; data from the second half of 2024. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
6. Planable, agency profit margins report (186 agencies). https://planable.io/blog/agency-profit-margins-report/ . 2026-03-17. Read at source on 2026-10-10; public page only.
7. Clutch, social media marketing pricing. https://clutch.co/agencies/social-media-marketing/pricing . Updated 2026-09-21. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
8. Empire Flippers, listing 87450. https://empireflippers.com/listing/87450/ . Undated listing. Read at source on 2026-10-10, directly and through a reader service.
9. US Census Bureau, Nonemployer Statistics 2023, national file, industry code 5418. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/nonemployer-statistics/datasets/2023/historical-datasets/nonemp23us.zip . Data year 2023; file dated 2025-05-15. Read at source on 2026-10-10. Shares and averages are our sums (estimate).
10. US Census Bureau, record layout for the nonemployer files. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/nonemployer-statistics/technical-documentation/record-layouts/us-record-layout/us_record_layout_2017.txt . Covers 2017 to 2024 files. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
11. US Census Bureau, About Nonemployer Statistics. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/nonemployer-statistics/about.html . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
12. Visionary Marketing, B2B cold email statistics 2026. https://visionary-marketing.co.uk/blog/b2b-cold-email-statistics-2026 . 2026-04. Read at source on 2026-10-10. The contacts-per-client figures built on it are our sums (estimate).
13. Instantly, Cold Email Benchmark Report 2026. https://instantly.ai/cold-email-benchmark-report-2026 . 2026-01-12. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
14. Optifai, win rate by sales stage. https://optif.ai/learn/questions/win-rate-by-sales-stage/ . 2026-04-20. Read at source on 2026-10-10. The 25% small-deal rate is our multiplication of its four stage rates (estimate).
15. Focus Digital, average marketing agency churn. https://focus-digital.co/average-marketing-agency-churn/ . 2026-07-06. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
16. MarketingProfs, “Why small and midsize businesses hire marketing agencies”, reporting a survey by inTandem/vcita of 500 US owners. https://www.marketingprofs.com/charts/2025/53481/why-small-midsize-businesses-hire-marketing-agencies . 2025-08-06. Secondary; read through a reader service on 2026-10-10.
17. Promethean Research, “How profitable are digital agencies”. https://prometheanresearch.com/how-profitable-are-digital-agencies/ . 2026-04-19. Read at source on 2026-10-10. Agency counts: https://prometheanresearch.com/digital-agency-industry-report/ , 2026 edition, read at source on 2026-10-10.
18. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook, market research analysts. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/business-and-financial/market-research-analysts.htm . May 2025 data. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
19. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, survival of establishments, professional, scientific and technical services. https://www.bls.gov/bdm/us_age_naics_54_table7.txt . Data to March 2025. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
20. HighLevel, pricing and affiliate terms. https://www.gohighlevel.com/pricing and https://www.gohighlevel.com/affiliate-terms . Undated pages. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
21. Instantly, pricing. https://instantly.ai/pricing . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
22. Sprout Social, pricing. https://sproutsocial.com/pricing/ . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10. Prices are in the page’s own text for yearly and monthly billing.
23. Vendasta, pricing. https://www.vendasta.com/pricing/ . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10; price lines only.
24. Ippei, review of Agency Navigator. https://ippei.com/agency-navigator/ . Updated 2026-05-28. Secondary.
25. Consulting.com, home page and Monetise page. https://consulting.com/ and https://www.consulting.com/monetise . Undated pages. Read at source on 2026-10-10. The addresses https://educate.io and https://growyouragency.com redirected to it when checked on 2026-10-10.
26. Educate.io, terms. https://educate.io/policy/terms . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
27. Imperium Acquisition, home page and academy page. https://imperiumacquisition.com/ . Undated pages. Read at source on 2026-10-10; student counts are as written in the page’s source text.
28. Imperium Acquisition, earnings disclaimer and terms. https://imperiumacquisition.com/earnings-disclaimer and https://www.imperiumacquisition.com/terms-and-conditions . Undated pages. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
29. Trustpilot, reviews of Imperium Acquisition. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.imperiumacquisition.com and https://www.trustpilot.com/reviews/6ab5d5633924632b9b0a73a2 . The page shows 2025-09-25 as the date of the experience; the review’s ID number points to posting on 2026-09-25 (estimate). Secondary (a customer’s account and the company’s reply); read through a reader service on 2026-10-10.
30. Affluent.co, disclaimer. https://www.affluent.co/disclaimer . Undated page, footer 2026. Read at source on 2026-10-10. No longer cited: we could not show that this company sells an agency course.
31. MessengerFlow, home, playbook, affiliate and refund pages. https://messengerflow.com , https://messengerflow.com/playbook , https://messengerflow.com/become-an-affiliate , https://messengerflow.com/legal/refunds . Refund page updated 2026-02-16; others undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
32. Whop, checkout page for Lead Academy. https://whop.com/checkout/68dKsOtAyAaTJZKg13-1Ne4-TL4r-apGO-O0U8lOCJGJY4/ . Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service. Profile text and link read at https://api.fxtwitter.com/georgeytishin , a service that shows the public text of X profiles.
33. RunAds.ai, home page. https://runads.ai/ . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service. The profile text that points to it was read through api.fxtwitter.com.
34. X profile texts read through api.fxtwitter.com, a service that shows the public text of X profiles: https://api.fxtwitter.com/CharlieImperium , https://api.fxtwitter.com/thedennis and https://api.fxtwitter.com/GadzhiIman ; and the link page https://linktr.ee/dwilleboordse (through a reader service). Read at source on 2026-10-10. The service sometimes answers “User not found” for accounts that exist, so each was tried more than once.
35. Skool, affiliate programme. https://www.skool.com/affiliate-program . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
36. Reddit, r/SMMA top posts feed. https://www.reddit.com/r/SMMA/top/.rss?t=all&limit=100 . Posts dated 2023 to 2026. Read at source on 2026-10-10; the count is ours (estimate).
37. Reddit, r/SMMA, post and follow-up. https://www.reddit.com/r/SMMA/comments/1kjuigb/started_in_october_now_i_have_80_clients/ (2025-05-11) and https://www.reddit.com/r/SMMA/comments/1nu5bd4/its_been_one_year_since_i_started/ (2025-09-30). Read at source on 2026-10-10.
38. Reddit, r/SMMA, two threads. https://www.reddit.com/r/SMMA/comments/1l89zme/ive_send_1000_emails/ (2025-06-10) and https://www.reddit.com/r/SMMA/comments/1kkvr0o/how_tf_do_you_actually_get_your_first_client/ (2025-05-12). Read at source on 2026-10-10.
39. Reddit, r/SMMA thread. https://www.reddit.com/r/SMMA/comments/1qc652b/i_need_help_i_dont_get_any_clients/ . 2026-01-13. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
40. Reddit, r/SMMA, two threads. https://www.reddit.com/r/SMMA/comments/1qef056/anyone_here_actually_make_money_running_ads_for/ (2026-01-16) and https://www.reddit.com/r/SMMA/comments/1gdec0u/smma_as_a_business_model/ (2024-10-27). Read at source on 2026-10-10.
41. Newsletter post on signing first agency clients. https://toussaints-newsletter.beehiiv.com/p/beginner-signs-3-smma-clients-prove-can . 2024-09-17. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
42. Starter Story, social media marketing agency success stories. https://www.starterstory.com/ideas/social-media-marketing-agency/success-stories . Updated 2026-05-02. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
43. Not used. This entry held an interview that was removed on 2026-10-10 because its subject appears to have been under 18 at the time it describes. The number is kept so the other numbers do not change.
44. Starter Story, Base Coat Marketing interview. https://www.starterstory.com/stories/within-3-months-my-digital-marketing-agency-exceeded-expected-revenue-144k-year . 2022-04-23. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
45. Productive, BenchPress 2025 key findings. https://productive.io/bold/benchpress-2025-key-findings/ . 2025-04-30. Secondary.
46. Flippa, listing 13417177. https://flippa.com/13417177 . Undated ended listing. Read at source on 2026-10-10. Acquire.com listing: https://app.acquire.com/public/o7r7o5w1f5-high-growth-digital-performance-marketing-agency-for-sale , read at source on 2026-10-10.
47. Meta, Advertising Standards. https://transparency.meta.com/policies/ad-standards/ . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
48. Meta, Self-Serve Ad Terms. https://www.facebook.com/legal/self_service_ads_terms . Effective 2025-08-22; update announced for 2026-10-30. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
49. Meta, payment terms. https://www.facebook.com/payments_terms . Updated 2026-07-30. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
50. Meta Business Help, restricted ad accounts. https://www.facebook.com/business/help/975570072950669 . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
51. The Record, report on Meta’s advertising enforcement. https://therecord.media/meta-scam-advertising-crackdown . 2026-03-11. Secondary.
52. Inc42, report on Blink Digital’s suit against Meta. https://inc42.com/?p=573487 . 2026-09-23. Secondary.
53. Meta, Terms of Service. https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms . Effective 2025-01-01. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
54. Meta, Messenger Platform policy overview. https://developers.facebook.com/docs/messenger-platform/policy/policy-overview/ . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
55. LinkedIn Help, prohibited software and extensions. https://www.linkedin.com/help/linkedin/answer/a1341387 . “Last updated: 2 years ago”. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
56. Google Ads policies, third-party policy and the guide for advertisers. https://support.google.com/adspolicy/answer/6086450?hl=en and https://support.google.com/adspolicy/answer/9457109?hl=en . Undated pages. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
57. Google Ads Help, Partner badge requirements. https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/9702452?hl=en . Undated page. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
58. FTC, Advertising FAQs: a guide for small business. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/advertising-faqs-guide-small-business . April 2001, edited January 2025. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
59. FTC, Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule: questions and answers. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/consumer-reviews-testimonials-rule-questions-answers . November 2024. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
60. FTC, CAN-SPAM Act: a compliance guide for business. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/can-spam-act-compliance-guide-business . August 2023, edited January 2024. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
61. Google Workspace Admin Help, email sender guidelines. https://support.google.com/a/answer/81126?hl=en . Requirements effective 2024-02-01. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
62. FTC, press release on the Telemarketing Sales Rule changes. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/03/ftc-implements-new-protections-businesses-against-telemarketing-fraud-affirms-protections-against-ai . 2024-03-07. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
63. UK Information Commissioner’s Office, business-to-business marketing. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/direct-marketing-and-privacy-and-electronic-communications/business-to-business-marketing/ . Undated page, marked as under review. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
64. US Internal Revenue Service, self-employment tax. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/self-employment-tax-social-security-and-medicare-taxes . Updated 2026-06-27. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
65. Washington State Department of Revenue, services newly subject to retail sales tax. https://dor.wa.gov/taxes-rates/retail-sales-tax/services-newly-subject-retail-sales-tax . Law effective 2025-10-01. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
66. FTC, press release on Lurn. https://www.ftc.gov/node/81724 . 2023-09-28. Read at source on 2026-10-10, through a reader service.
67. FTC, press release on the Growth Cave complaint. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/03/ftc-takes-action-stop-sprawling-growth-cave-business-opportunity-credit-repair-scam . 2025-03-07. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
68. FTC, press release on the Growth Cave settlement. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/01/ftc-secures-settlement-banning-growth-cave-defendants-marketing-selling-business-opportunities . 2026-01-27. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
69. FTC, press release on the Air AI settlement. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2026/03/air-ai-its-owners-will-be-banned-marketing-business-opportunities-settle-ftc-charges-company-misled . 2026-03-24. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
70. FTC, press release on proposed earnings-claim rules. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-proposes-rule-changes-new-rule-deter-deceptive-earnings-claims-multilevel-marketers-money-making . 2025-01-13. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
71. SparkToro, “The state of digital agencies in 2024”, a survey of 612 agency owners and consultants. https://sparktoro.com/blog/the-state-of-digital-agencies-in-2024-client-referrals-drive-agency-new-business-but-is-it-enough-and-are-sales-pipelines-a-cause-for-concern . 2025-01-16. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
72. Exchange4media, “Meta aims to fully automate advertising with AI by 2026”, reporting a Reuters item on a Wall Street Journal story. https://www.exchange4media.com/digital-news/meta-aims-to-fully-automate-advertising-with-ai-by-2026-144037.html . 2025-06-03. Secondary; read through a reader service on 2026-10-10.

Corrections

If you are quoted or named on this page and think something is wrong, want your reply shown beside it, or want to be removed, write to [email protected]. We aim to reply within 14 days, and always within one month. Factual errors are corrected with a dated note here. A sentence that is seriously disputed comes down while we check it.

Change log: (empty)