UGC creator brand deals

The research was done by AI agents that open web pages. Some sites refuse them; where that happened we say so. The small numbers point to the source list at the end. Where a figure is our own sum or guess, it is marked “our estimate” and the basis is given.

The claim

Our collection for this scheme holds only 4 tweets¹. Two come from accounts that our rules allow us to name. One has more than 10,000 followers. The other names a course and its price in the tweet; we found the sales page on a site that links back to that X account¹⁴³. The other two are from small accounts and are described without names. With so few tweets, this page rests mostly on how the method is promoted generally: by platforms, course sellers and guides. View counts are as collected on 6 October 2026. Dates are worked out from each tweet’s ID number. The page judges the scheme, not the people who tweeted.

“if i were absolutely broke and in high school or college, i would create ugc videos for platforms like whop

it’s honestly your perfect entry point to make money while building serious skills in content creation and marketing

this approach can net you a couple grand per month”

@masonrizz, 16 April 2025, 1,353 views¹

“a nine-month exclusivity on a small check is the most expensive yes you will say 💡

the exclusivity trap is a vague category. “beauty” blocks hundreds of brands. “vitamin C serums” blocks a handful.

if you want my help, there’s the Paid Creator Formula. It is $397 one-time and” (cut off in our collection)

@giiicestone, 6 October 2026, 4 views¹

(“Exclusivity” is a promise not to work for competing brands for a set time.) The first tweet is the only one of the four that states an income¹. The second makes no income claim; it is advice about contracts followed by a course offer¹. The most-viewed tweet in the collection dates from January 2023 and invites beginners to reply; it names no income¹. The fourth is advice on how to apply for UGC work¹.

None of the four texts gives a rate per video, a number of videos, a platform fee, hours of work or a tax figure¹. We read the tweet texts only; their images, videos and threads were not viewed.

What the scheme is

“UGC” stands for user-generated content. In this scheme it means short product videos that look like an ordinary customer filmed them on a phone: an unboxing, a demonstration, a review. A brand pays a freelancer to make one, then uses it as an advert or on its product page.

The selling point is that the creator needs no audience. Billo, one of the marketplaces, says: “No professional experience or social media presence is required.”²² The brand ships the product, the creator films, and the brand gets the file.

There are three ways the work is found and paid:

• Marketplaces. Sites such as Billo, JoinBrands and Collabstr list jobs. The creator applies, films, and is paid a flat fee once the brand approves the video. The site takes a cut¹⁰¹⁴²².
• Direct deals. The creator pitches brands by email or message and sets their own price. A “retainer” is a standing monthly order, for example 8 videos a month for a fixed sum³⁵.
• Pay per view. The creator posts videos on their own accounts and is paid by how many views they get. This is how Whop, the platform named in the first tweet, pays. Its programme is called Content Rewards²⁵.

The mechanism is real. On Collabstr, UGC campaigns rose “from 15% to 35%” of all campaigns in a year⁸. The questions are how much a job pays, and how many paid jobs one person can get.

The arithmetic

The tweet says “a couple grand per month”. We take that as $2,000. The tweets give no figures to multiply, so every number below comes from outside them¹.

Step 1: what one job pays

Collabstr. The best measurement we found is Collabstr’s annual report, built from “472,000+ packages and 21,000 collaborations” on its own marketplace in 2025⁸. Under “Average influencer costs by platform” it lists “UGC - $154”, against an average asking price of $180⁸. The report does not say whether $154 is what the brand paid or what the creator received, or how many videos one deal holds⁸. It is an average, not a median (the middle value), and it covers one marketplace. Two more lines from the report cover all kinds of deal on Collabstr, not UGC alone: “Eighty percent of all engagements cost under $300” and “Only 2% of engagements exceed $1,000”⁸. Collabstr refused a direct fetch; we read it through r.jina.ai, a reader service that fetches a page and returns its text.

JoinBrands. The default price a brand sees for a UGC video in the US is $60, and the brand can lower it to a $50 floor¹³. That is the rate for a 15-second video on a campaign aimed at Level 1 creators, the entry level¹³. A campaign aimed at Level 2 pays 50% more and Level 3 pays 100% more, so $90 and $120 (our sums); longer videos add 10% to 50%¹³¹⁴. The higher rate applies only when the brand chooses to aim the campaign at that level¹³. These prices are for “Classic (pay-per-job)” campaigns. JoinBrands also sells brands “Blast” bundles: “Flat-fee packs of 10 / 25 / 50 / 100 jobs at a steep per-job discount”¹³. Its example prices a TikTok post at $40 in a pack of 10 and $25 in a pack of 100⁷⁸. That is the likely reason its public price list says “UGC Videos | $25+”¹⁵. We did not find what the creator receives on a Blast job.

Billo. Billo does not publish a price list for creators in text. Its blog gives a range: “$50 to $500+ per video”, and says: “Entry-level creators with a handful of finished samples typically earn in the $50 to $150 range per video.”²⁴ Those are the platform’s own claims. Two sets of Billo’s own totals allow a check:

• Platform-wide. Billo’s About page says that by January 2024 it had “200,000+ videos delivered to 22,000+ brands, $8.3M paid out to more than 5,000 creators”⁷³. Our estimate: about $41.50 a video, and about 40 videos and $1,660 per creator over the platform’s life to that date. The figures are round and the payout total may include photos and add-ons.
• Showcased creators. Billo’s creator page shows lifetime totals for three people: $162k for 2,452 videos, $92k for 1,287 and $73k for 1,402²². Our estimate: about $66, $71 and $52 a video.

What brands pay. Trend sells brands up to 6 videos for $550, which is $91.67 each (our sum), and Insense says UGC starts at $100 a video²⁶²⁷. The creator receives less than the brand pays.

Guides quote much higher prices. JoinBrands’ own blog says: “Most professional UGC creators charge $500-$1,200 per video.”¹⁶ That is about ten times the Level 1 default on its own marketplace¹³. We found no dataset behind the higher figures.

Step 2: the platform’s cut

Collabstr charges brands “a 10% fee on each order” and says: “Creators pay a separate 15% fee on their payout.”¹⁰ Because the report does not define the $154, three readings are possible. If $154 is the order price before the creator’s fee, the creator keeps $130.90. If it includes the brand’s 10% fee, the creator keeps about $119. If it is already the payout, the creator keeps $154. These are our sums. We use the range $119 to $154.

JoinBrands: “The amounts below are before the platform fee (20% for free creators, 15% for Creator Pro).”¹⁴ At the $60 default a free member keeps $48; at the $50 floor, $40; at Level 2 and Level 3, $72 and $96 (our sums). JoinBrands’ help page ties Creator Pro to its paid Creator Academy, which showed a price of $47 a month¹⁴⁷⁷.

Upwork, a general freelance site where such jobs are also sold, charges freelancers “0% to 15% per contract”⁶⁹.

Step 3: how many paid jobs the claim needs

All counts are our sums: the target divided by the pay per unit, rounded up.

So “a couple grand” means 13 to 17 paid deals a month at Collabstr’s reported average, or 42 videos a month at the JoinBrands Level 1 default: more than one approved video every day. The table shows prices, not work that is on offer.

Step 4: how many videos people actually make

The only survey with a spread of results asked over 1,000 UGC creators in late 2023¹⁸. It found “a median of 10 posts per month for full-time and 5 posts per month for part-time”¹⁸. Most part-timers worked 6 to 10 hours a week and most full-timers 21 to 40¹⁸.

Our estimate: 5 pieces at $119 to $154 is about $600 to $770 a month, and 10 pieces is about $1,190 to $1,540. That assumes every piece is a paid deal at the Collabstr average. The survey’s “posts” may include unpaid work or work paid only in free product, so the true figure is likely lower.

Step 5: the work of getting hired

The unpaid part of the job is applying. Billo tells creators: “Check the app daily and apply to at least 10 tasks each day. To boost your chances, aim for 30 applications when you start.”²¹ Insense says brands “usually choose creators within 5-10 business days” and advises “aiming for at least 20 applications to get chosen in one”⁷⁶. Speekly, another marketplace, is reported to advise “applying to at least 50 jobs to secure the first commission”³⁴; we did not open Speekly’s own page. No platform we read publishes how many applications lead to one job.

In the survey, 57% of creators named reaching out to brands as the hardest part¹⁸.

There may also not be enough work to go round. UGC was 35% of campaigns in Collabstr’s report⁸. If the 21,000 collaborations are the full year’s total, that is about 7,350 UGC deals on the whole marketplace in 2025, and one creator doing 13 to 17 a month would need 2% to 3% of all of them (our estimate; the report does not say whether 21,000 is the total).

Step 6: the Whop route named in the tweet

Whop pays per view, not per video. Its blog says: “Content Rewards clippers are, on average, paid $1 per 1,000 views.”² (“Clippers” are people who cut and repost clips of someone else’s content.) Its documentation tells brands: “UGC content typically pays higher rates than clipping”, and gives the example title “Fanatics UGC - $3 per 1,000 views”⁵. A newsletter reports that creators “get paid after a 30-day verification window at $0.50 to $3 per thousand views”⁵⁰; that is second-hand.

The brand sets the rate, a minimum a video must earn before it is reviewed, and a cap per video⁵. Whop’s example: “With a $3 reward rate and $6 minimum payout, only videos with at least 2,000 views enter your review queue”⁵.

At $1 per 1,000 views, $2,000 a month needs 2 million approved views every month. At $3 it needs about 670,000, and at $0.50 it needs 4 million (our sums). Either way, income on this route depends on reach, which is the one thing classic UGC work is said not to need.

We did not find what fee Whop takes from creators, or a current average rate for UGC campaigns.

Step 7: costs and tax

Starting costs are low. Whop’s guide prices a ring light at $20 or less and a clip-on microphone at $20 to $30, with a phone assumed³. The brand ships the product.

The tweet says “net”, but tax comes out too. In the United States this is self-employment income: “The self-employment tax rate is 15.3%”²⁹, charged on “92.35% of your net earnings from self-employment”⁷⁰. That is about $283 a month before income tax (our estimate: 15.3% of 92.35% of $2,000, if the $2,000 is already net of fees and expenses).

A course is optional. The one in our collection costs $397⁴³. That equals about 3 average Collabstr deals or about 8 JoinBrands Level 1 videos after fees (our sums).

What the arithmetic shows

The claimed figure is possible. It needs more paid jobs than the median full-time creator in the survey produced, or a price well above the marketplace averages. Whop’s own guide puts it in the experienced bracket: “Beginners in UGC can realistically earn $100-$500 per month part time, while experienced creators can scale past $2000-$5000 per month”³. Virlo, a company that sells creator tools, publishes a similar ladder: “Beginner (0 to 6 months) | $50 to $150 | $250 to $750 (part-time)”³². Neither shows data.

What people who tried it report

The one survey

NeoReach and Influencer Marketing Hub surveyed over 1,000 UGC creators in late 2023 and published the results in June 2024¹⁸. All figures are the creators’ own estimates, not checked against payment records.

• “While the average estimated total earnings was $12.3k, the median total earnings was $1,000.”¹⁸
• “the median annual earnings were $1,500”¹⁸. That is $125 a month (our sum); the tweet’s $2,000 a month is 16 times that. The median respondent was a part-time beginner, as the next lines show.
• 59% had been doing UGC for less than a year, and almost two thirds were part-time¹⁸.
• Many began with “gifted” work, paid only in free product: “more than 76% of the creators that have only received gifts from brands have been working in UGC for less than a year”¹⁸.

The gap between the average and the median means a small group earns most of the money¹⁹.

Limits. The survey is three years old. It found people on Instagram and TikTok, so people who tried and stopped are missing, and so may be people who work only through marketplaces¹⁸. The report says of the annual figure: “For many creators that have not been doing UGC for a full year, this could be their predicted earnings for the year.”¹⁸ It also says the creators “have earned an estimated $5.7M from UGC” in total; at a $12.3k average that is about 460 people (our estimate), so fewer than half of the respondents may have answered the earnings question¹⁸. We found no newer survey.

Marketplace data

Collabstr’s reports show both supply and demand rising while prices fall. Its 2025 report said: “The number of user-generated content (UGC) creators has surged by 93% year over year”, and that UGC asking “Prices decreased by approximately 44.37%”⁹. Its 2026 report says UGC campaigns “grew (+133%)” in 2025, and adds a further price fall: “the cost of UGC campaigns dropped by 5.7% on the Collabstr platform from an average of $209 to an average of $197”⁸. It gives the reason as “a market where content is easier to produce, creators are more prevalent”⁸.

The 2026 report gives two UGC averages, $154 and $197, and does not say how they relate⁸.

Collabstr’s “Top UGC” page says its list is ordered by “follower count, engagement rate, audience quality, and more”, so it does not show who gets the most work¹².

Three operators publish payout totals. Divided by their own creator counts they give small sums per person. All three are our estimates from round figures the operators chose, and each creator count includes people who signed up and never worked:

• Billo: about $1,660 per creator to January 2024, as in Step 1⁷³. Its App Store listing repeats “$8.3 million paid out to creators”²⁵.
• JoinBrands: its Creator Academy page says “more than $100M paid out to creators over the last 4.5 years” across “100,000+ creators”⁷⁷. That is about $1,000 per creator over 4.5 years. Its pricing page gives a different count, “4M+ creators and affiliates”¹⁵.
• Insense: “$8M Paid out to creators since 2020” beside “100K+ Instagram & TikTok influencers and UGC creators”⁷⁶. That is about $80 per listed creator.

Individual reports

One skincare blogger published her first month of active UGC work, July 2022: “Overall Paid UGC income $540”³³. Of that, $80 was for video; the rest was photographs and a bundle³³. She counts 21 pieces of content, about $26 a piece (our sum)³³. A further $40 of that month’s work and $750 carried over from the month before were still awaiting payment³³. She showed no proof documents. She wrote that she had about 4,700 Instagram followers and that most of the work came from brands that already liked her photography³³.

The reports of higher income that we found all came from people or pages with something to sell to would-be creators:

• A creator interviewed on a travel blog in 2024 says: “With UGC, I’ve been making anywhere from $6,000 to $10,000 per month.”³⁵ He sells a course; in the interview he says “Our course is currently $500” and offers a discount code³⁵.
• A creative director in paid advertising wrote in 2022 that one client pays a monthly retainer, “max charge is set at $6,800/month”, which “comes out to $81,600 for the year” at the cap³⁶. She adds: “I’ve never maxed out the retainer.”³⁶ She prices that work by the hour, “roughly $200-$300+ per hour”³⁶. The post invites readers to subscribe to her newsletter at “$5/month or $50/year”³⁶.
• Customer reviews on a coaching programme’s Trustpilot page range from “I am making about $300 to $400 a week consistently, when I work it” to “I’m closing in on $50,000 in total income from UGC work” at 8 to 9 months³⁷.

None of these showed payment proof. Reviews of a paid course are written by customers who chose to post, so people who paid and earned little are likely under-counted.

A Wall Street Journal article, which we read only through an IBTimes UK summary, quotes a barista who said “about five hours of UGC work a week can earn him $1,000 to $2,000 a month”⁴⁹. The same summary says another creator “earned $11,000 in July after several videos went viral, working about five to seven hours a week”, and that a third was “paid more than $800” for one set of videos⁴⁹. These are what the creators told the paper; the summary does not say records were checked⁴⁹.

Journalism and forums

In July 2022 the newsletter Embedded wrote that “the hundreds of videos promoting this have an eerie MLM quality to them, presenting UGC creation as a guaranteed, lucrative avenue that anyone can pursue”, and quoted a brand consultant: “you need to pump out A LOT of content to get a decent check.”³⁹ (MLM means multi-level marketing.) In January 2026 Glossy wrote of creators who sell through TikTok Shop, a nearby kind of work: “Fees have come down, output demands have gone up”⁴⁰. Neither piece followed a group of creators over time.

Reddit blocked every route we tried, so no forum thread was read. A third-party index of the largest forum, r/UGCcreators, shows 92,000 members and lists “looking, paid, and struggling” among its frequent topics⁴². That is an index of post titles, not the posts.

What the rules allow now

Filming product videos for brands as a freelancer is legal and the platforms allow it. Two rules decide which version is allowed.

The video must be honest

In the United States, a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rule announced in August 2024 as the “Final Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials”⁵⁷ makes it a violation “for a business to write, create, or sell a consumer review, consumer testimonial, or celebrity testimonial that materially misrepresents” that the person “used or otherwise had experience with the product”⁵². The rule defines “business” to include “an individual who sells products or services”⁵². Reading that as covering a freelance UGC creator is our reading of the text. No case has decided it.

The FTC’s Endorsement Guides add: “Endorsers may be liable for statements made in the course of their endorsements”, including “when an endorser falsely represents that they personally used a product”⁵³. The FTC’s own guidance puts it plainly: “You can’t talk about your experience with a product if you haven’t tried it.”⁵⁵

So a demonstration, or a real opinion after really using the product, is allowed. A script that says “I’ve used this for three months” when the creator has not is what the rules prohibit.

Enforcement so far has been aimed at companies. In December 2025 FTC staff sent warning letters to 10 unnamed companies, noting “civil penalties of up to $53,088 per violation”⁵⁴. Those letters concern only the companies that received them. The FTC says “our focus usually will be on advertisers or their ad agencies and public relations firms. However, action against an individual endorser might be appropriate in certain circumstances”⁵⁵. In November 2023 it sent warning letters to 12 health influencers over undisclosed paid posts⁵⁶. We found no penalty case against an individual UGC freelancer.

The United Kingdom draws the same line. Its advertising code says: “Marketing communications must not falsely claim or imply that the marketer is acting as a consumer”, and brands “must hold documentary evidence to show that a testimonial or endorsement used in a marketing communication is genuine”⁶⁷.

Paid posts must be labelled

This applies when the creator posts the video on their own account. TikTok’s branded content policy, in effect since 31 August 2026, says: “When posting Branded Content, you must enable the commercial content disclosure toggle.”⁶⁰ Its help page says: “If you don’t display the proper disclosure, we may remove or restrict your posts.”⁶⁰ Meta says: “Branded content may only be posted with the use of the branded content tool”⁶².

Age and country

Billo’s creator terms, effective 1 October 2026, say: “You must be at least 18 years old”, and that registration “is available only to individuals who are physically located in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, or Australia”²³. Billo’s creator page lists only the first three countries²². The terms are the binding document.

Other marketplaces are wider. JoinBrands runs five marketplaces: the US, Canada, the UK, Australia and Germany with the EU¹⁴. Insense lists the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and 16 European countries⁷⁶.

Whop’s earnings terms say “Must be 18+ years old”⁶. Its Youth Safety Policy says “Users under 18 cannot earn until” a guardian’s identity is verified and the guardian consents⁷. Whop’s two pages conflict, and we did not establish which governs Content Rewards. Either way, a school-age reader cannot simply sign up and be paid.

Contract terms that cost money

• Pay depends on approval. On Billo, payment follows the brand’s acceptance, and “the Brand remains solely responsible for payment and Billo assumes no responsibility for the Brand’s performance or any non-payment”²³. Billo’s terms for brands do list unjustified rejection as unfair conduct that can get a brand suspended²³. JoinBrands says it “collects all funds from the brand upfront and holds them in escrow until your work is approved”¹⁴.
• Whop does not guarantee payment. “We don’t guarantee you’ll receive any specific Bounty payments or that Sellers will honor their Bounty commitments.”⁶ (“Bounty” is Whop’s word for a paid promotional task.)
• You give up the rights. On Billo, “you irrevocably assign and transfer to the Brand all rights, title, and interest” in the video “worldwide”, once the brand accepts it²³. JoinBrands tells brands: “When you purchase any content, you will acquire unlimited usage rights.”¹⁵ “Usage rights” means permission for the brand to run the video as a paid advert, usually for a set period. Guides teach creators to charge extra for it; on these marketplaces it is included.
• Lock-in. Billo bars creators for “twelve (12) months” from working with a Billo brand “outside the Billo Platform”²³. Collabstr’s equivalent period is 18 months¹¹.
• Legal duty sits with the creator. Billo’s terms require that statements in the video “are truthful and not misleading under relevant consumer protection or advertising laws”²³.
• AI copies. Billo’s terms bar brands from making AI-altered versions of the creator without separate written consent²³. The same terms let Billo itself “generate AI-derived creative variations or derivative insights based on your Deliverables”²³. Direct contracts may go further. A trade-press summary of a Business Insider article describes a clause giving a brand “the perpetual right to turn her voice and facial features into AI for future advertising”⁶⁵. That is one example, read second-hand.

Other ways to lose money

The FTC warned in October 2023 about people posing as brand ambassador managers: “The tell-tale sign is when they ask for personal or bank account information so they can supposedly start making payments.”⁵⁸ Billo’s guide says: “Legitimate gigs never ask you to pay a fee upfront.”²⁴

We did not find published reports of withheld pay about Billo, Insense, JoinBrands or Trend. That may be a search failure.

Tax

In the United States, self-employment tax applies once “net earnings from self-employment” are “$400 or more”²⁹. From tax year 2026 the threshold for the 1099-NEC form (the form a payer sends to report what it paid a freelancer) “increased to $2,000”³⁰. Many small creators will get no form. The income is still taxable.

In the United Kingdom, “You can get up to £1,000 each tax year in tax-free allowances for property or trading income”; above that, “you must register for Self Assessment”⁶⁸. Other countries were not checked.

AI video

AI-made product videos are now sold on the same price lists as human ones. JoinBrands lists “AI Videos | $5 /video” beside human UGC videos¹⁵. MakeUGC sells AI actor videos from $29 a month, billed yearly²⁸. TikTok offers brands stock AI avatars; a 2024 news report quotes its announcement: “Much like stock photos, they provide quick, accessible and cost-effective narration for brands”⁶⁴.

There are limits. TikTok says: “We also require creators to label all AI-generated content that contains realistic images, audio, and video”⁶¹. A law firm reports that New York has required adverts to disclose AI “synthetic performers” since 9 June 2026⁶³. The FTC said its 2024 rule covers testimonials by someone who does not exist, “such as AI-generated fake reviews”⁵⁷. We found no measurement of how much brand spending has moved from human creators to AI video.

Who makes money from it

The marketplaces earn on every deal, whether or not a given creator gets enough work.

• JoinBrands charges brands a platform fee of 8% to 15% and plans up to $499 a month, and takes 15% to 20% from the creator¹⁴¹⁵.
• Collabstr charges brands “a 10% fee on each order” (5% on its top plan) and takes 15% from the creator¹⁰.
• Insense charges brands a monthly plan plus a marketplace fee of 7% to 20%²⁷.
• Billo sells brands a fixed price per video and does not publish the creator’s share²².

A marketplace that also sells training. JoinBrands’ help page says its Creator Academy “gives you step-by-step courses, 3 live calls a week, content reviews, and brand-deal playbooks, and Level 2 creators who join unlock Creator PRO (lower fees, no payout limits, early deal access)”¹⁴. The Academy page showed “$47/month” and 1.9k members on the day we read it⁷⁷. So the lower 15% fee comes with a paid membership. The five-point saving covers $47 only above about $940 of earnings a month (our sum). The wording “no payout limits” suggests free members have a payout limit; we did not read what it is. The same page promises: “Make money as a creator or we’ll refund your membership if you don’t start earning within 3 months.”⁷⁷

Whop hosts the campaigns and hosts paid UGC courses. Its blog tells would-be creators: “The answer, quite simply, is finding UGC communities and courses on Whop.”⁴ The post opens by saying the reader’s feed is full of “UGC creators are making tens of thousands of dollars a month online”⁴. It tells readers to build a portfolio, because “a brand generally isn’t going to take you on without seeing your work first”, and says of the courses and communities: “You don’t need to be an influencer, have a portfolio, own expensive gear”⁴. We did not find what fee Whop takes on campaign payouts.

Course and coaching sellers. Of our four tweets, one names a course and its price¹.

That course is “The Paid Creator Formula”, a seven-day live group course: “COHORT 2 — $397 · $147 FOR PRO ACCELERATOR OWNERS · CAP 10”⁴³. (A cohort is a group that takes a course together.) The seller says on the page, as her own statement that we did not check, that she has “spent 6+ years working in UGC, with 1,000+ brand collaborations”⁴³. The same site sells a $97 seven-day challenge, a $147 written audit and a $297 self-paced course⁷⁴, a “4-WEEK PRIVATE MENTORSHIP $997”, and a three-month mentorship at “3 monthly payments of $597”, which is $1,791 (our sum)⁴⁴.

What that site says about outcomes, in its own words:

• “Some students may not earn income during or after the program.”⁴⁴
• The Paid Creator Formula page says it is not for people who “expect a guaranteed brand deal or income”, and: “My income is my own and is not typical.”⁴³
• Most products are final sale. Only the $297 course has a refund, within 90 days and on conditions; under it, requests based on “dissatisfaction with individual business results do not qualify”⁴⁶.
• Students and alumni can apply to a partner programme that pays “30% commission on every eligible referral”⁴⁵. The page lists the $297 course, the audit and the strategy call as eligible, and marks the $97 challenge “Not commissionable”⁴⁵.

The site is clear about these terms. The buyer carries the risk of earning nothing.

Other sellers aim higher. One coaching company describes itself on Trustpilot as teaching “how to stop chasing one-off collabs and start securing $5–10K months with brand retainers”³⁸. Another academy’s home page shows “$500K+ Earned by our students” and “800+ Worldwide students”⁴⁷. Both figures are the seller’s own round minimums, so nothing firm follows from them.

Regulators. We found no court or regulator action about a UGC course or UGC platform by name. In January 2025 the FTC proposed requiring proof for earnings claims in “money-making opportunities, such as business coaching”⁵⁹. That was a proposal; we did not find a final rule.

The pattern in what we found. Every first-person report above $2,000 a month that we found came from someone selling a course or newsletter, recruiting for a programme, or from a course’s customer reviews^31353637. The one first-person report with nothing to sell was $540 for a month³³. This is a pattern in a handful of sources found by search, which favours people who market themselves. It is not proof of anything about any one person.

The upside

Success in this scheme exists and is recorded. It looks like steady, high-volume work paid by the piece, or a few direct clients on retainer.

The best records without a following

Billo’s showcased creators. Billo’s page shows one creator who “Joined in 2020” with “2452 Videos created” and “Total earnings on Billo $162k”²². Our estimate: about $2,000 to $2,300 a month over six to seven years, at 30 to 35 videos a month. The other two, both “Joined in 2021”, come to roughly $1,000 to $1,600 a month at 18 to 24 videos a month (our estimate)²². These figures are published by the platform and not independently checked. They are the platform’s chosen examples. The best of the three sits at about the tweet’s “couple grand”; the other two are under it.

JoinBrands’ top creators. On the site’s UGC top list, the first creator shows 588 completed jobs in total and describes herself as a “3+ year UGC creator”; the first page runs down to 153¹⁷. If those jobs were spread over three years, that is about 16 a month (our estimate); her time on JoinBrands itself is not shown. The 42 videos a month in the table is about 504 a year, close to that creator’s lifetime total. The site’s general top-rated list starts higher, at 1,475 completed jobs, but its first profile is described as a JoinBrands content team member, so we do not count it as a freelancer’s record¹⁷.

The best records with clients or skills

Retainers. The creator reporting $6,000 to $10,000 a month describes one retainer of 8 videos a month for $1,500, which is $187.50 a video (our sum)³⁵. He says he “only had a few thousand followers” after 18 months of trying to grow an account, and that the retainer came when a brand approached him for videos to post on its own account³⁵. The figures are his own statement and he sells a course.

Advertising experience. The creative director with the retainer capped at $81,600 a year wrote: “I already work full-time, making a six-figure salary”, “I started making as low as $50/hour”, and “I was introduced to this client through a previous agency co-worker”³⁶. Her figures are her own statement. Her path ran through years of paid-advertising work and industry contacts.

Volume posting. A newer model has creators post on accounts run by the brand. A trainer’s newsletter says: “The range I have seen is $20 to $55 a video”, and gives her own example of $30 a video at 9 videos a day³¹. That is $8,100 over a 30-day month (our sum). She reports trainees at $2,500 to $15,000 a month³¹. These are her statements about people she trained, with no proof shown, and the post invites readers to apply to her programme³¹.

A month that goes viral. The $11,000 month in the Wall Street Journal summary above is the best single month we found from someone not shown selling a course; it is self-reported and read second-hand⁴⁹.

Pay per view. Whop’s blog said in April 2025 that the manager of its Whop Clips programme “is paying out up to $190,000 to creators monthly”⁵¹. An August 2026 article says Forbes reported that Content Rewards “was paying out more than $40,000 a day across nearly a million videos a month”⁷⁵; Forbes itself refused our fetch. Our estimate from those two figures: about $1.2 million a month, or about $1.20 for the average video. At that average, $2,000 a month would be some 1,600 videos, so income on this route comes from the few videos that travel far. A newsletter reports that the best clippers at one company make $30,000 to $40,000 a month running several accounts, and gives “Over $1.7M paid out through Content Rewards specifically. 98,000+ registered clippers” with no date⁵⁰. Both are second-hand. Whop’s Content Rewards community page showed 97.2K members on the day we read it⁴¹.

Scale of the market. SideShift, another marketplace, states “$10M+ Paid to creators in the last 30 days” and says “Typical earnings for creators on SideShift range from $200-$2,000 per month, plus performance bonuses of $1-$4 per 1,000 views”⁴⁸. Both are the operator’s own unaudited figures.

The top tenth and top hundredth

No source publishes them. No platform we read gives a median or a spread of earnings per creator. The survey gives only a median and an average¹⁸. What can be said: the average total ($12.3k) is about twelve times the median ($1,000), so the top earners are far above the middle¹⁸.

For comparison, a 2025 survey of over 3,000 creators of all kinds, most of them with audiences, found “more than half still earn under $15,000 a year”²⁰.

A realistic good result

No source measures how long anyone took to reach a given income, so we cannot give a timetable. What the records above show is a set of levels:

• Most people on record: under $200 a month. The survey median was $125 a month, and the platform totals work out at $80 to $1,660 per creator over several years (our estimates)^18737677.
• A steady marketplace regular: several hundred dollars a month. This is our estimate: 5 to 10 approved jobs at the prices in the table.
• $1,000 to $2,300 a month: the level of the three creators Billo chose to showcase, after five to seven years on the platform²².
• Above that: direct clients, retainers, or pay-per-view videos that reach millions of views. None of these is measured in any source we found.

What it takes to compete

Volume and reliability. The freelancers with records behind them deliver about 18 to 35 videos a month, month after month²². Billo’s higher-paying Premium tier needs 14 approved videos, at least 5 rated videos, an average rating of 4.8 or more and 90% or more delivered on time⁷¹.

Selling, not only filming. In the survey, reaching brands was the hardest part for 57% of creators¹⁸. The platforms themselves advise 20 to 50 applications before a first job²¹³⁴⁷⁶.

Proof that your videos sell. The highest earners we found had advertising experience, results to show, or clients who came through contacts³⁵³⁶. The creative director also warned that cheap work teaches brands “a UGC concept is worth $50-$100/video”³⁶.

Repeat clients. The creator on $6,000 to $10,000 a month credits retainers, not one-off jobs³⁵. One retainer of 8 videos for $1,500 replaces about 31 JoinBrands Level 1 videos after fees (our sum from¹³¹⁴³⁵).

The right country and age. The marketplaces we read take adults in a set list of countries, as described above¹⁴²³⁷⁶.

What it costs. Money: about $50 of equipment and a phone³. Time: daily applications, plus filming, revisions and waiting for approval²¹. A course is not required. The marketplaces are free to join, and nothing we found shows that buyers of courses earn more.

How to tell early which side you are on. These are our suggestions, based on the figures above:

• After 30 to 50 applications, have you been hired at all? Billo and Speekly both treat that as the normal range for a first job²¹³⁴.
• Do brands approve your videos without repeated revisions, and does any brand order a second time? Repeat orders are what the high earners have³⁵.
• Within three months, can you finish and get approved 10 or more videos a month? That is the median full-time output in the survey, and it yields about $1,190 to $1,540 at the Collabstr average (our estimate)⁸¹⁸.
• Has anyone offered you a monthly retainer or a price above about $150? If every offer is near $50, you are in the volume market, and the table above shows what that requires.
• On the Whop route: do your videos regularly pass a few thousand views? In Whop’s own example, a video under 2,000 views is not even reviewed⁵.

What we did not verify

• The tweets. We read the four tweets from our collection file and did not re-open them on X. Their images, videos and threads were not viewed. Four tweets do not show how the scheme is promoted on X in general.
• Whop’s current terms. The $1 per 1,000 views figure is from March 2025 and is about clippers. Whop’s separate Content Rewards terms page returned “Whop not found”. The fee Whop takes and current average rates for UGC campaigns were not read; the $0.50 to $3 range and the 30-day wait are second-hand⁵⁰. Third-party guides say the fee is 10% but disagree on who pays it. We did not check whether the tweet’s author has any tie to Whop.
• JoinBrands. What a creator receives on a Blast job, and whether Blast bundles explain the public “$25+” figure, are likely but not confirmed. The payout limit for free members and the creator-side terms were not read.
• Billo’s pay per video. The price list is published only as an image we could not read. Our figures come from Billo’s own totals. Billo’s help centre says payouts in the US, Canada and UK moved from PayPal to weekly Stripe transfers⁷²; its blog and creator page still describe payment every two weeks²²²⁴.
• Collabstr. Its figures are its own and unaudited. It publishes averages, not medians. Whether $154 is before or after fees, how many videos a deal holds, and whether the 21,000 collaborations are the full year’s total are not stated.
• Anything newer than the late-2023 survey. We found no current figure for the share of creators reaching $1,000 or $2,000 a month, no drop-out rate, and no count of people who tried and earned nothing.
• Payment proof. No bank, PayPal or platform dashboard proof was found for any individual. Every individual figure on this page is that person’s own statement.
• Press. The Wall Street Journal article was read only through a summary. Business Insider, Forbes and several other news sites could not be reached.
• Forums. Reddit refused every route. No thread was read.
• A second first-year report. We saw one more first-person income report, on a private individual’s personal social account. It is left out under our naming rule. The July 2022 report we do cite is a public blog post written to share income figures, and we cite it without naming its author.
• Direct deals. Prices of $150 to $1,200 a video for off-platform work appear only in guides from companies that sell to creators or brands. No dataset was found.
• Courses. No outcome data was found for any UGC course. Prices and terms were read only for the one seller named in our collection and for JoinBrands’ Academy. Cheaper courses and template packs seen in search results were not opened.
• AI video. Only list prices were read. The New York law was read through a law firm’s post; the statute page refused our fetch.
• Law. Whether any regulator has penalised an individual UGC freelancer. We found none, which may be a search failure. The status of the FTC’s January 2025 proposal after that date. Rules in the EU and elsewhere.
• Other platforms. Fiverr and Upwork listings were blocked. Creator-side terms for Insense and Trend were not read.
• Hours per video. Nobody measures them, so no hourly rate could be worked out.

Sources

1. Does It Pay collection of 4 tweets on this scheme, collected 2026-10-06. Read from our file on 2026-10-10; not re-opened on X.
2. Whop blog, “Content Rewards”. https://whop.com/blog/content-rewards/ . Dated 2025-03-03. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
3. Whop blog, “How to become a UGC creator”. https://whop.com/blog/how-to-become-a-ugc-creator/ . Dated 2025-10-15. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
4. Whop blog, “What is a UGC creator”. https://whop.com/blog/what-is-a-ugc-creator/ . Dated 2025-10-14. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
5. Whop documentation, Content Rewards. https://docs.whop.com/memberships-and-access/third-party-apps/content-rewards.md . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
6. Whop, earnings terms. https://whop.com/earnings-terms/ . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
7. Whop, Youth Safety Policy. https://whop.com/youth-safety-policy/ . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
8. Collabstr, 2026 Influencer Marketing Report. https://collabstr.com/2026-influencer-marketing-report . 2026 annual report covering 2025; exact day not shown. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through the r.jina.ai reader service (direct fetch refused).
9. Collabstr, 2025 Influencer Marketing Report. https://collabstr.com/2025-influencer-marketing-report . 2025 annual report covering 2024. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
10. Collabstr, pricing page. https://collabstr.com/pricing . Page stamp 2025-09-10. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
11. Collabstr, terms. https://collabstr.com/terms . Last updated 2025-09-09. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
12. Collabstr, “Top UGC” list. https://collabstr.com/top-influencers/ugc . Live page. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
13. JoinBrands help, campaign pricing defaults and minimums. https://help.joinbrands.com/en/articles/15254941-brands-campaign-pricing-defaults-and-minimums-per-type . “Updated over 2 weeks ago”. Read at source on 2026-10-10 (full page text, direct fetch).
14. JoinBrands help, creator fees and levels. https://help.joinbrands.com/en/articles/6267226 . “Updated over 2 weeks ago”. Read at source on 2026-10-10 (full page text, direct fetch).
15. JoinBrands, pricing page. https://joinbrands.com/pricing . Page stamp 2026-10-10. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
16. JoinBrands blog, UGC creator rates. https://joinbrands.com/blog/ugc-creator-rates/ . Dated 2026-08-15. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
17. JoinBrands, top-rated creators, the UGC top list and public profiles linked from them. https://joinbrands.com/creators/ and https://joinbrands.com/top-creators/ugc/ . Page stamp 2026-10-10. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
18. Influencer Marketing Hub and NeoReach, UGC creator survey report. https://influencermarketinghub.com/?p=190741 . Dated 2024-06-26; survey run in late 2023. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
19. NeoReach, UGC report page. https://neoreach.com/quarterly-reports/ugc/ . Published 2024. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
20. Influencer Marketing Hub, Creator Earnings Report 2025. https://influencermarketinghub.com/creator-earnings-report-2025/ . Dated 2025-08-04. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
21. Billo help, how to get approved for your first task. https://help.billo.app/en/articles/5344052-for-creators-how-to-get-approved-for-your-first-task . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
22. Billo, page for creators. https://billo.app/for-creators/ . Modified 2026-10-07. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
23. Billo, terms of service for creators. https://billo.app/terms-of-service-creators/ . Effective 2026-10-01. Also terms for brands, https://billo.app/terms-of-service/ , effective 2026-09-23. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
24. Billo blog, UGC creator jobs. https://billo.app/blog/ugc-creator-jobs/ . Published 2026-08-14, modified 2026-09-30. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
25. Apple App Store, Billo Creator listing. https://apps.apple.com/us/app/billo-creator-sell-content/id1499355971 . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
26. Trend, pricing page. https://www.trend.io/pricing . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
27. Insense, pricing page. https://insense.pro/pricing . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
28. MakeUGC, pricing page. https://www.makeugc.ai/pricing . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
29. US Internal Revenue Service, self-employment tax. https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/self-employment-tax-social-security-and-medicare-taxes . Last reviewed 2026-06-27. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
30. US Internal Revenue Service, Instructions for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC. https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i1099mec . Revision 12/2026. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
31. Fame Not Required (a Substack newsletter published at this address), “What Creators Are Actually Making Doing Canvas UGC”. https://thecreatorcurrent.substack.com/p/what-creators-are-actually-making . Dated 2026-04-03. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
32. Virlo blog, how much UGC creators make in 2026. https://virlo.ai/blog/this-is-how-much-ugc-creators-make-in-2026-real-data . Dated 2026-06-15. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
33. Real Skin Diaries, UGC creator income breakdown, July 2022. https://realskindiaries.com/ugc-creator-income-breakdown-july-2022/ . Dated 2022-08-05. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai (full text).
34. Passionfruit, article on UGC creator earnings. https://passionfru.it/?p=165578 . Dated 2026-09-01. Secondary.
35. Mike and Laura Travel, interview on making money from UGC. https://mikeandlauratravel.com/how-to-make-money-from-ugc-instagram/ . Dated 2024-04-21. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
36. UGC Social newsletter, “My rates as a UGC creator, part 1”. https://ugcsocial.substack.com/p/part-1-my-rates-as-ugc-creator . Dated 2022-09-26. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
37. Trustpilot, reviews of ugcfasttrack.com. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/ugcfasttrack.com . Reviews dated 2025-02 to 2026-10-01. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
38. Trustpilot, profile of ugc-world.com. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/ugc-world.com . Read at source on 2026-10-10.
39. Embedded, “Please don’t quit your job to make UGC”. https://embedded.substack.com/p/please-dont-quit-your-job-to-make . Dated 2022-07-14. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
40. Glossy, article on TikTok Shop and creator fees. https://www.glossy.co/fashion/what-works-to-drive-sales-on-tiktok-shop-has-changed-creators-say/ . Dated 2026-01-20. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
41. Whop, Content Rewards community page. https://whop.com/discover/content-rewards/ . Live page. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
42. GummySearch, index of r/UGCcreators. https://gummysearch.com/r/UGCcreators/ . Last updated 2026-09-30. Secondary.
43. Its Social Gi, The Paid Creator Formula. https://www.itssocialgi.com/paid-creator-formula . Undated; the page links to x.com/giiicestone. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
44. Its Social Gi, mentorship page. https://www.itssocialgi.com/mentorship . Footer 2026. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
45. Its Social Gi, affiliate programme. https://www.itssocialgi.com/affiliate-program . Read at source on 2026-10-10.
46. Its Social Gi, refund policy. https://www.itssocialgi.com/refund-policy . Last updated 2026-09-16. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
47. UGC Mastery Academy, home page. https://ugcma.com/ . Page stamp 2026-10-06. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
48. SideShift, home page and pricing blog post. https://sideshift.app/ and https://sideshift.app/blog/how-much-should-you-charge-for-ugc . Live page; blog undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
49. IBTimes UK, summary of a Wall Street Journal article on paid UGC adverts. https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/tiktok-breakup-paid-aqua-voice-ugc-ad-1820961 . Dated 2026-09-21. Secondary.
50. Phil’s newsletter, “Even HBO is running a clip farm now”. https://phil.beehiiv.com/p/even-hbo-is-running-a-clip-farm-now . Dated 2026-08-03. Secondary.
51. Whop blog, “Whop Clips”. https://whop.com/blog/whop-clips/ . Shown as 2025-04-08 (2025-04-09 UTC). Read at source on 2026-10-10.
52. US Code of Federal Regulations, 16 CFR Part 465 (consumer reviews and testimonials). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-465 . Rule published 2024-08-22; version of 2026-09-01. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through the eCFR site’s own data feed (the web page refused).
53. US Code of Federal Regulations, 16 CFR Part 255 (Endorsement Guides). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-255 . Revised 2023-07-26; version of 2026-09-01. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through the eCFR site’s own data feed.
54. FTC press release, warning letters to 10 companies under the consumer review rule. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/12/ftc-warns-10-companies-about-possible-violations-agencys-new-consumer-review-rule . Dated 2025-12-22. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
55. FTC, “FTC’s Endorsement Guides: What People Are Asking”. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/ftcs-endorsement-guides-what-people-are-asking . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
56. FTC press release, warning letters to trade associations and influencers. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption . Dated 2023-11-15. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
57. FTC press release, final rule banning fake reviews and testimonials. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/08/federal-trade-commission-announces-final-rule-banning-fake-reviews-testimonials . Dated 2024-08-14. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
58. FTC business blog, on bogus brand ambassador managers. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2023/10/influence-peddling-bogus-brand-ambassador-managers-scam-prospective-influencers . Dated 2023-10-17. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
59. FTC press release, proposed rule changes on earnings claims. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2025/01/ftc-proposes-rule-changes-new-rule-deter-deceptive-earnings-claims-multilevel-marketers-money-making . Dated 2025-01-13. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
60. TikTok, Branded Content Policy, and its help page on commercial content. https://www.tiktok.com/legal/page/global/bc-policy/en and https://www.tiktok.com/support/faq_detail?id=7636670088170904085 . Published 2026-08-04, effective 2026-08-31. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
61. TikTok help, AI-generated content. https://www.tiktok.com/support/faq_detail?id=7636670084747893268 . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
62. Meta, branded content policy. https://www.facebook.com/business/help/221149188908254 . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
63. Kelley Drye, “NY synthetic performer law goes into effect”. https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/blogs/ad-law-access/ny-synthetic-performer-law-goes-into-effect . Dated 2026-06-08. Secondary.
64. 404 Media, report on TikTok’s AI avatars for adverts. https://www.404media.co/tiktok-introduces-ai-avatars-for-ads-as-ftc-warns-companies-not-to-do-that/ . Dated 2024-06-18. Secondary.
65. Net Influencer, summary of a Business Insider article on AI and UGC adverts. https://www.netinfluencer.com/ai-ugc-ads-gone-viral-business-insider/ . Dated 2024-05-22. Secondary.
66. Net Influencer, report on creators’ payment allegations against Partipost, with the company’s reply as reported by Marketing-Interactive. https://www.netinfluencer.com/southeast-asian-creators-accuse-influencer-marketing-platform-partipost-of-withholding-campaign-payments/ . Dated 2026-05-26. Secondary. No longer cited in the text.
67. UK Advertising Standards Authority, CAP advice on testimonials and endorsements. https://www.asa.org.uk/advice-online/testimonials-and-endorsements.html . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
68. UK HM Revenue and Customs, tax-free allowances on property and trading income. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/tax-free-allowances-on-property-and-trading-income . First published 2017-04-07. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
69. Upwork help, freelancer service fees. https://support.upwork.com/hc/en-us/articles/211062538-Freelancer-Service-Fees . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
70. US Internal Revenue Service, Topic no. 554, Self-employment tax. https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc554 . Last reviewed 2026-09-24. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
71. Billo help, becoming a Premium Creator. https://help.billo.app/en/articles/6230554-for-creators-becoming-a-premium-creator . Dated 2025-10-23. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
72. Billo help, how and when you’ll get paid. https://help.billo.app/en/articles/5830098-for-creators-how-and-when-you-ll-get-paid . “Updated yesterday” when read. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
73. Billo, About us. https://billo.app/about-us/ . Live page; the milestone quoted is dated January 2024. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
74. Its Social Gi, terms of service. https://www.itssocialgi.com/terms . Last updated 2026-10-08. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
75. CreatorDB, “The Rise of the Clip Economy”, reporting a Forbes article from April 2026. https://creatordb.app/creator-news/the-rise-of-the-clip-economy/ . Dated 2026-08-26. Secondary.
76. Insense, page for creators. https://insense.pro/for-creators/en . Undated. Read at source on 2026-10-10.
77. JoinBrands, “UGC & TikTok Creator Academy” page on Skool, linked from JoinBrands’ help page. https://www.skool.com/joinbrands/about . Live page. Read at source on 2026-10-10 through r.jina.ai.
78. JoinBrands help, Blast Campaigns. https://help.joinbrands.com/en/articles/7065697-blast-campaigns . “Updated today” when read. Read at source on 2026-10-10.

Corrections

If you are quoted or named on this page and think something is wrong, want your reply shown beside it, or want to be removed, write to [email protected]. We aim to reply within 14 days, and always within one month. Factual errors are corrected with a dated note here. A sentence that is seriously disputed comes down while we check it.

Change log: (empty)